“ Framing activity, meaning, and social movement participation: The nuclear disarmament movement.” Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.īenford, R. Mere civility: Disagreement and the limits of toleration. “Evil religion?” The Christian century.īejan, T. Oxford: Oxford University Press.īaker, K. Smith (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cultural sociology (pp. Cultural sociology and civil society in a world of flows: Recapturing ambiguity, hybridity and the political. Culture, power, and institutions: A multi-institutional politics approach to social movements. New York: WW Norton & Company.Īrmstrong, E. The cosmopolitan canopy: Race and civility in everyday life. The discourse of American civil society: A new proposal for cultural studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Īlexander, J. ![]() Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Īlexander, J. Fournier (Eds.), Cultivating differences: Symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality (pp. Citizen and enemy as symbolic classification: On the polarizing discourse of civil society. New York: New York University Press.Īlexander, J. Williams (Eds.), Religion and progressive activism: New stories about faith and politics (pp. ‘Neutral’ talk in educating for activism. Overall, the article seeks to stimulate and guide future empirical research on civility contests and to deepen theoretical understandings of the relationship between symbolic and social boundaries and the role of symbolic boundary-work in the reproduction of political inequality.Īdler Jr., G. It then highlights patterned disparities in the outcomes of these contests, demonstrating that the likelihood of being marked as uncivil and the extent to which this prompts negative social sanction is shaped by one’s social position. Through a focus on the realm of political protest in the United States, this article demonstrates that civility contests involve a wide range of political actors (including institutionalized power holders, opposing movements, and the media) who engage in this boundary-work in order to justify the control or (de)legitimation of protest. This article begins to fill this gap by developing the concept of civility contests-practical efforts to draw symbolic boundaries between civil and uncivil individuals, groups, or behaviors. Yet this everyday classification process remains understudied and undertheorized, despite being widespread and having significant stakes for the individuals and groups involved. Beyond the reaches of scholarly debates about how to define and value civility properly, social actors across various institutional domains routinely demarcate civil from uncivil behavior.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |